Quote:
The people who disliked Mujib were defending the idea of Pakistan (and actually defending Islam in their mind). Some of them took up arms, helped Pakistani Army and fought against MuktiBahini in 1971.
.............................................
Having said all this, if people criticize Mujib's role after 1971 - I don't have any problems - it is fair that as the head of the government he is accountable.
|
You said it all mate ... most people of our generation who do not like Mujib is due to 2 reasons:
1. Most important reason is the post 1971 era. Creation of রক্ষিবাহিনী, বাকশাল etc.
2. The excessive media hammering of Mujib / জাতির পিতা etc. during 1996-2001. This is a less important reason but it had its adverse effect. লেবু বেশি কচলালে যা হয়।
Quote:
If you don't support Mujib you are definitely a rajakar.
.................................................. ......
That’s why it is said that if you don't support Mujib, (chances are) you ARE a rajakar.
|
Now, you started and ended your argument claiming if someone does not like Mujib he is (definitely/most likely) Razakar. And all the arguments you provided was regarding the period leading to 1971.
By the way ... it is funny how you changed your position within the same post. Typical ?
Quote:
But in all of Mujib's criticisms - it seems like - you'll hear echoes of Pakistan era criticisms of him. That he was too close to India (selling the country to India etc), that he was hindu-leaning bengali who didn't care about Islam and Muslims. And the critics(rajakars and their progenies) mix these pre-1971 criticisms with some of his post-1971 failures - and have been able to deliver it with their subtle propaganda.
|
You mean
you hear ..... and we have our right to disagree right? Oooh no .... that will make us Razakars !! Damn !! (So much for democracy)
Go figure ...